![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Facilities Fleet
|
We have continued to build on the work undertaken with the Carbon Trust to calculate the carbon footprint of several of our sparkling soft drinks in Great Britain and Dasani water in the United States. We measured the carbon emissions associated with every stage of the product’s lifecycle and found that packaging accounted for between 30 percent and 70 percent of the carbon footprint, depending on variations in product, ingredients, and packaging material. Building on this work, we are developing a database to allow us to calculate the carbon footprint of any of our beverages much more easily. Understanding how a product’s carbon footprint changes depending on packaging type, size, sweetener, refrigeration time, and other variables will allow us to make environmentally informed decisions for our products in the future, and reduce their carbon footprint over time. We also have shared the findings from our original footprinting work with the Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable (BIER) members to help formulate specific industry guidelines for product footprinting. Because packaging accounts for such a large proportion of all our product footprints, in 2009 we have focused on how to reduce packaging carbon impacts. The most effective way is to decrease the amount of virgin packaging material used. Aluminum cans already average 50% recycled content, so our focus has been on polyethylene terephthalate (PET), in which standard recycled content is much lower. We have been working in three main ways to reduce the virgin PET we use in our bottles by:
At present our ability to use both bPET and rPET is constrained by availability and cost. However, over time we aim to increase to 10 percent rPET in North America and 25 percent rPET in Europe, and to roll out PlantBottle more widely where commercially viable. |