![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Recycling Overview Recycling Strategy
|
By including recycled content in our packages, we conserve non-renewable resources — while also reducing the energy used in the material’s manufacturing. Increasing Recycled Aluminum in Our Containers Aluminum is a material that is easily and quickly recycled and can be reused multiple times without compromising its quality. As a result, it has been recycled for nearly four decades. More than 95 percent of recycled aluminum goes into new beverage cans, which can be back on the shelf in as few as 60 days. Recycled aluminum also uses 95 percent less energy to produce than aluminum from bauxite ore. Currently, more than 50 percent of the aluminum we use in our cans is made from recycled aluminum, and the technology exists to increase this to nearly 75 percent. We do not yet have the supply needed to achieve this level of recycled content. The opportunity exists to capture more material; currently in the U.S., more than 40 billion cans are still sent to landfills each year. Our work to increase packaging recycling rates seeks to address this issue (see “Effective Recovery and Consumer Recycling”). Increasing Recycled PET in Our Containers Recycled PET (rPET) uses 30 percent less energy to produce than virgin PET. As the efficiency of the recycling process (see "How We Recycle Our Plastic Bottles" below) continues to improve, energy and cost savings will continue to grow. However, the market for recycled plastics is not yet as well developed or as cost-efficient as for aluminum. Additionally, unlike aluminum, rPET is hard to process for use in food and beverage containers because of its variable quality. Currently, the quantity of high-quality, food-grade recycled plastic that we need to produce safe bottles is not consistently available. Consequently, we are still working to increase the recycled PET content in our bottles. Although PET recycling rates increased in the U.S. and in Europe in 2009, there still remains a significant gap in the amount of material that can be recycled and the amount of material that actually is recovered and recycled. In Europe, we reached an average of 10 percent rPET content in our packaging by the end of 2009. However, supply of quality food-grade rPET is still limited, so we continue to test new technologies and materials to improve supply and quality, while also working to improve recovery and recycling rates to make rPET more readily available for use in our products. We intend to achieve 17.5 percent recycled content by the end of 2010 and 25 percent by 2012. In North America, where the market for recycled PET is less developed than in Europe and there is less quality and cost consistency, our target is to include 10 percent rPET content. However, it has not yet been economically feasible to do so, and in 2009 we used 3.2 percent. In North America, rPET needs to be consistently available and less costly or at cost parity with virgin material in order for it to be a sustainable choice. We are investing in a long-term strategy through our ownership of Coca-Cola Recycling to increase recycling rates, and we are working with The Coca-Cola Company to support their bottle-to-bottle recycling plant in Spartanburg, South Carolina. We believe this will drive down the cost of processing rPET and increase our access to food-grade-quality material over time. Innovative Reuse Projects
In addition to our traditional beverage containers, we are working to use our secondary packaging in new and innovative ways. The 55-gallon HDPE barrels in which product concentrate is delivered to our production facilities are being reused as recycle bins and rain barrels (see “Providing Rain Barrels”) instead of going to landfills. Since 2008, more than 17,000 barrels have been reused as recycle bins, which can hold up to 300 bottles and cans at any one time. This project has given a new life to more than 500,000 pounds of HDPE. In certain facilities, plastic bags that originally carried bottle caps are being reused as trash and recycling bags, thereby reducing facility costs and waste. Packaging Trade-offs rPET vs. Lightweighting: Our work on reducing the environmental impact of our packaging involves a number of trade-offs. We have discovered that while we strive to increase the recycled content of our bottles, it is more difficult to lightweight bottles with high proportions of rPET because more resin is required to maintain structural integrity. In the past, this conflict has meant deciding between using recycled content and creating a lighter bottle. However, during 2009, we developed and tested a new 12-ounce bottle that meets our quality and lightweighting ambitions, and is capable of containing rPET. This lightweighted bottle will be introduced in parts of the U.S. in 2010. Lightweighting vs. Secondary Packaging: The more we lightweight our bottles and cans, the more secondary packaging may be needed to limit breakage and damage in transit and storage. As we learn more, we integrate these considerations into our packaging decisions. With the help of our product carbon footprinting calculator (see "Our Product Footprints"), we hope to study the carbon impacts not only of the packaging options themselves (materials used, associated CO2 emissions, and recycled content), but also of their wider ramifications: how much and what type of secondary packaging they require, how efficiently they can be transported, and how they can be stacked on the shelves. Currently, our packaging approval process includes an evaluation of corporate responsibility and sustainability (CRS) implications. In Europe, we evaluate the impact of the packaging on our CRS-related commitments and stakeholder views. |